How many days is it permissible to offer sacrifice after Eid-ul-Adha?
How many days is it permissible to offer sacrifice 
after Eid-ul-Adha?
Imam Shafi'i say,s
Al-Adhayyah Review of the Day of Atonement and the days from all of them to the days of Fisk etc.
Sacrifice is permissible on all the days of Mani. Because these are the days of Hajj.
So he said in Hajj and the days of sacrifice are all over the place.
If it is asked what is the reason for this that the sacrifice is valid for all the days of Mina (from 10 Zi Al-Hijjah to 13). The answer is that the sacrifice for two days of Eid is valid for the same reason. The third day is also valid for the same reason. He himself said the sacrifice on the first day of Eid and after that he did not stop the sacrifice for two days nor for the third day ie for the 13th date. He did not separate it from the eleventh and the 12th. Rather, when he is equal to them in the rules of Hajj, then why should he be separated from them in the Qurbani without any argument. If he is asked if there is any hadith about it, then the answer is that there is evidence from him in the Sunnah. This is also briefly confirmed in the footnote of Kitab-ul-Alam, Volume 5.
Ibn Qudaamah says in Mughni about this sect.
On the last days of Tashreeq and the religion of Shafi'i and the saying of Ata and Al-Hasan is narrated on the authority of Jabir ibn Mutam that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
Slaughter is valid till the last days of Tashreeq.
Imam Shoukani says after discussing the hadith of Jubayr bin Mutam.
Asfadl al-Hadith on the day of Tashreeq, all the days of slaughter, one day of Nahr and three days later Ibn Abbas, Atta, Hassan Al-Basri, Omar Ibn Eid Al-Aziz, Sulaiman Ibn Musa Al-Asadi, the jurist of the people of Syria, Makhool and Shafi'i, and Dawood Al-Zahiri Manhar and all the days of Tashreeq slaughter and narration from the hadith of Jubayr ibn Mutam and its intersection and from the hadith of Asamah ibn Zayd on the authority of Atta on the authority of Jabir Qal Yaqoob ibn Sufyan Osama ibn Zayd
This hadeeth is a proof of the fact that slaughter is valid in all Tashreeqs. That is, it is narrated from Hazrat Ali in Yom al-Nahr and three days after that in Zad al-Ma'ad that the sacrifice is valid for three days after Eid. It is written in Sharh. And Jubayr bin Mutam and Ibn Abbas Ata Hassan Basri. Umar bin Abdul Aziz. Salman Musa Asadi who is a jurist of Syria. Narrated by Imam Shafi'i and Dawood Zahiri. Ibn Qayyim has narrated Atta and Ozai and What is the religion of Bin Munther? Then he said: This hadith is narrated in two ways. It is a source of strength for each other. There is a break in the method of Jubayr bin Mutam. The hadith of Jabir is narrated in the way of Osama bin Zayd. That Usama bin Zayd is very trustworthy among the people of Madinah.
Hafiz Ibn Hajar says:
He said, "This is a falsehood of Tayma for Tahawi.
There is no narration from the Companions except these two religions. The other statement (ie the sacrifice is for four days) is called the opinion of the people.
وحجة الجمهور حديث جبير بن مطعم رفعه فجاج منى منحر وفي كل ايام التشريق ذبح اخر جه احمد لكن
(Conquest of India pp. 325-323)
The evidence of the majority is the hadith of Jubayr ibn Mut'am. It is correct to slaughter in all the days of Tashreeq. His men are trustworthy.
This hadith has been narrated by Ahmad in Musnad by Ibn Habban in Sahih. But in the same interjection, not from Abdul Rahman ibn Abi Hussain Jubayr ibn Mutam, Baqi has mentioned it in Ma'rifat al-Sunan wa'l-Athar. Has mentioned in the manner of Abu Sa'id. And Abu Sa'id has a slight weakness. In the zikr of Bazaar, Suwaid is not trustworthy.
The hadith of Jubayr ibn Mutam has been narrated in different ways. It has been narrated in different ways. There is something wrong with all the methods. However, it has been proved by the whole method that there is some truth in the hadith. The trend is on the same side. Because the rest of the sects are either absolutely proof. Or they are based only on the relics of the Companions. Therefore, the same is true of the sect of the Hanafis. After mentioning the relics of Ibn 'Abbas, he says: "Poverty is very poor. It is very poor."
Obviously, the doctrine of Imam Shafi'i, in addition to being the doctrine of the masses, is also relatively strong in terms of argument. Therefore, the practice of this doctrine is correct. And denial of ignorance.
Imam Bayhaqina has mentioned all the methods of the hadith of Jubayr bin Mutam. And in the way of Mu'awiyah bin Yahya Sadfi, he has narrated both Abu Saeed and Abu Hurayrah. Ibn Abbas, Atta, Umar bin Abdul Aziz. He also mentions the relics of Salman ibn Musa and Makhul, which show the strength of the source of this sect as a whole.
(Sunan Bahqi, vol. 2, p. 295)
Allama Turkmani is known to be a fanatic for Hanafis. He also says.
This chapter on the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is not correct
(V. 8, p. 267)
That is, there is no hadith from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) on either side in this matter. The whole orbit of the Sahaabah is clear. In this case, denial of any sect is also against honesty.
after Eid-ul-Adha?
Imam Shafi'i say,s
Al-Adhayyah Review of the Day of Atonement and the days from all of them to the days of Fisk etc.
Sacrifice is permissible on all the days of Mani. Because these are the days of Hajj.
So he said in Hajj and the days of sacrifice are all over the place.
If it is asked what is the reason for this that the sacrifice is valid for all the days of Mina (from 10 Zi Al-Hijjah to 13). The answer is that the sacrifice for two days of Eid is valid for the same reason. The third day is also valid for the same reason. He himself said the sacrifice on the first day of Eid and after that he did not stop the sacrifice for two days nor for the third day ie for the 13th date. He did not separate it from the eleventh and the 12th. Rather, when he is equal to them in the rules of Hajj, then why should he be separated from them in the Qurbani without any argument. If he is asked if there is any hadith about it, then the answer is that there is evidence from him in the Sunnah. This is also briefly confirmed in the footnote of Kitab-ul-Alam, Volume 5.
Ibn Qudaamah says in Mughni about this sect.
On the last days of Tashreeq and the religion of Shafi'i and the saying of Ata and Al-Hasan is narrated on the authority of Jabir ibn Mutam that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:
Slaughter is valid till the last days of Tashreeq.
Imam Shoukani says after discussing the hadith of Jubayr bin Mutam.
Asfadl al-Hadith on the day of Tashreeq, all the days of slaughter, one day of Nahr and three days later Ibn Abbas, Atta, Hassan Al-Basri, Omar Ibn Eid Al-Aziz, Sulaiman Ibn Musa Al-Asadi, the jurist of the people of Syria, Makhool and Shafi'i, and Dawood Al-Zahiri Manhar and all the days of Tashreeq slaughter and narration from the hadith of Jubayr ibn Mutam and its intersection and from the hadith of Asamah ibn Zayd on the authority of Atta on the authority of Jabir Qal Yaqoob ibn Sufyan Osama ibn Zayd
This hadeeth is a proof of the fact that slaughter is valid in all Tashreeqs. That is, it is narrated from Hazrat Ali in Yom al-Nahr and three days after that in Zad al-Ma'ad that the sacrifice is valid for three days after Eid. It is written in Sharh. And Jubayr bin Mutam and Ibn Abbas Ata Hassan Basri. Umar bin Abdul Aziz. Salman Musa Asadi who is a jurist of Syria. Narrated by Imam Shafi'i and Dawood Zahiri. Ibn Qayyim has narrated Atta and Ozai and What is the religion of Bin Munther? Then he said: This hadith is narrated in two ways. It is a source of strength for each other. There is a break in the method of Jubayr bin Mutam. The hadith of Jabir is narrated in the way of Osama bin Zayd. That Usama bin Zayd is very trustworthy among the people of Madinah.
Hafiz Ibn Hajar says:
He said, "This is a falsehood of Tayma for Tahawi.
There is no narration from the Companions except these two religions. The other statement (ie the sacrifice is for four days) is called the opinion of the people.
وحجة الجمهور حديث جبير بن مطعم رفعه فجاج منى منحر وفي كل ايام التشريق ذبح اخر جه احمد لكن
(Conquest of India pp. 325-323)
The evidence of the majority is the hadith of Jubayr ibn Mut'am. It is correct to slaughter in all the days of Tashreeq. His men are trustworthy.
This hadith has been narrated by Ahmad in Musnad by Ibn Habban in Sahih. But in the same interjection, not from Abdul Rahman ibn Abi Hussain Jubayr ibn Mutam, Baqi has mentioned it in Ma'rifat al-Sunan wa'l-Athar. Has mentioned in the manner of Abu Sa'id. And Abu Sa'id has a slight weakness. In the zikr of Bazaar, Suwaid is not trustworthy.
The hadith of Jubayr ibn Mutam has been narrated in different ways. It has been narrated in different ways. There is something wrong with all the methods. However, it has been proved by the whole method that there is some truth in the hadith. The trend is on the same side. Because the rest of the sects are either absolutely proof. Or they are based only on the relics of the Companions. Therefore, the same is true of the sect of the Hanafis. After mentioning the relics of Ibn 'Abbas, he says: "Poverty is very poor. It is very poor."
Obviously, the doctrine of Imam Shafi'i, in addition to being the doctrine of the masses, is also relatively strong in terms of argument. Therefore, the practice of this doctrine is correct. And denial of ignorance.
Imam Bayhaqina has mentioned all the methods of the hadith of Jubayr bin Mutam. And in the way of Mu'awiyah bin Yahya Sadfi, he has narrated both Abu Saeed and Abu Hurayrah. Ibn Abbas, Atta, Umar bin Abdul Aziz. He also mentions the relics of Salman ibn Musa and Makhul, which show the strength of the source of this sect as a whole.
(Sunan Bahqi, vol. 2, p. 295)
Allama Turkmani is known to be a fanatic for Hanafis. He also says.
This chapter on the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is not correct
(V. 8, p. 267)
That is, there is no hadith from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) on either side in this matter. The whole orbit of the Sahaabah is clear. In this case, denial of any sect is also against honesty.
Good job!
ReplyDeleteMashAllah
ReplyDeleteStunning post
ReplyDelete